Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted March 22, 2013 Report Share Posted March 22, 2013 RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlithuanian Posted March 22, 2013 Report Share Posted March 22, 2013 Gotta think he'll join SF... RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradjock Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 RT @RapSheet: Speaking of the #Bears: They still want to re-sign DE Israel Idonije and are trying to do so. Must fight off the #49ers to make it happen I hope we bring him back. He's been a constant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 I hope we bring him back. He's been a constant. Right now there signing 1 mil players. We paid him 2.5 last, so probably not going to happen.PLUS they got rid of 54, so I'm sure he wouldnt want to play here again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connorbear Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 Gotta think he'll join SF... San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted March 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace I want to say it's 14 or 15, but I catch your drift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 San Fransisco would be the obvious destination. However, I believe they have 17 picks in the draft. I'm sure they'll trade some but let's say they trade 5 and end up with a net 12 picks - they are not going to have a lot of roster space. I would wonder why a young team like the 49ers would want a player on the other side of 30. Peace You make a good point, plus I do see them trading picks, a good solid roster will maybe have 5 or 6 stick with the team? A lot of trades coming for SF for now and future picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 You make a good point, plus I do see them trading picks, a good solid roster will maybe have 5 or 6 stick with the team? A lot of trades coming for SF for now and future picks. Let's hope they'd like to move up to #20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 Let's hope they'd like to move up to #20. The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! For their 2nd 3rd round pick, #94, it works out pretty much even....Bears pick value = 1250 vs SF value 1284. For their 1st 3rd round, #66, the value would be 1250 vs 1420 so it may not work, I'm not sure how wide a margin these types of trades have. Trading our 1st for their 2R #34 & 3R #66 would work out as well 850 v 820. Adding in pick #157 (5R) makes it nearly spot on @ 850 v 848. A mid first for a high 2nd, a high 3rd, and an extra 5th would be pretty nice, esp with our primary need being LG and a guy like Larry Warford more than likely being available at 34. Here's the chart btw.... http://www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 The 49ers have 14 picks in this draft. I wonder what the trade index would say if we traded our 1 and 2 for their 1st, 2nd pick in rd2 and a 3rd? C'mon chart-meisters give me a stat! For our 20 and 50, we could get their 31, 34, 128 (4th), 157 (5th), and one or two of their 7th rounders (they have 4). I am assuming they want to shed some picks and not necessarily make a trade where they only lose one pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 Here is a new look on draft value: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/...ick-value-chart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 For our 20 and 50, we could get their 31, 34, 128 (4th), 157 (5th), and one or two of their 7th rounders (they have 4). or that lol....SF would be an ideal trade partner with their plethora of picks. Not sure if I'd rather have picks 31 & 34 or picks 34, 50, 66. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 Trading our 1st for their 2R #34 & 3R #66 would work out as well 850 v 820. Adding in pick #157 (5R) makes it nearly spot on @ 850 v 848. A mid first for a high 2nd, a high 3rd, and an extra 5th would be pretty nice, esp with our primary need being LG and a guy like Larry Warford more than likely being available at 34. I like this scenario the better, but the Raiders have pick #66, the 49ers don't pick until #74. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 I like this scenario the better, but the Raiders have pick #66, the 49ers don't pick until #74. Whoops, you're right. Add in a 6th rounder as well then....So #20 for 34/74/157/180 would work out and leave us with 3 picks in the top 75 vs on 2 and having to wait all the way till 117. This make me wanna do another mock lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daventry Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 I really hope that we can keep Idonije, he has been so solid as a player and what a great spokesman for the Bears! Hope the dollars add up and we keep him on.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 I really hope that we can keep Idonije, he has been so solid as a player and what a great spokesman for the Bears! Hope the dollars add up and we keep him on.... If SF is the only one to compete with I would say we have a good shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.