Ed Hochuli 3:16 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesson44 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 and why? If we had the number one pick ......I would trade down....with the moves we have made there is no true number one pick we need....... you know that got to have guy that we cant get later in the draft with the needs we have to fill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinger226 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 If we had the number one pick ......I would trade down....with the moves we have made there is no true number one pick we need....... you know that got to have guy that we cant get later in the draft with the needs we have to fill Since this is all a dream, how about Aaron Rodgers several years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears4Ever_34 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Assuming we can't trade the pick, I'd probably take Joekel. I wouldn't have signed Bushrod if we had the #1 pick though. You can't go guard #1, so Warmack is out of the picture. There's no QB worthy of being a #1 pick either. I'd consider Milliner or Letoulele but Joekel would have made the most sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TerraTor Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 If we had it as of right now... and no trade partners... Sharrif Floyd... guy looks completely nuts on the field. And a great person off the field.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 At this point? It's a toss up between Milliner and Jordan. As I've said in another thread, it's a passing league and Peanut isn't getting younger. Milliner locks down the nickle then moves to the outside when Peanut retires/moves to a safety position. Jordan is in the conversation though. He can play DE, or be a LB in both a 3-4 and a 4-3 so he offers up a lot of flexibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrizzlyBear Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Assuming we can't trade the pick, I'd probably take Joekel. I wouldn't have signed Bushrod if we had the #1 pick though. You can't go guard #1, so Warmack is out of the picture. There's no QB worthy of being a #1 pick either. I'd consider Milliner or Letoulele but Joekel would have made the most sense. exactly If we had it as of right now... and no trade partners... Sharrif Floyd... guy looks completely nuts on the field. And a great person off the field.. Same here, Love the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo3451 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 and why? Joekel. We are still deficient in OL talent. We might as well get the best one availible. Do we still get #20? If so, I'll take Cooper there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZ54 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Joeckel or Fisher and I also wouldn't have signed Bushrod. That money would have gone to fixing the OG or RT position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Assuming we can't trade the pick, I'd probably take Joekel. I wouldn't have signed Bushrod if we had the #1 pick though. You can't go guard #1, so Warmack is out of the picture. There's no QB worthy of being a #1 pick either. I'd consider Milliner or Letoulele but Joekel would have made the most sense. Any answer other than this one is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 At this point? It's a toss up between Milliner and Jordan. As I've said in another thread, it's a passing league and Peanut isn't getting younger. Milliner locks down the nickle then moves to the outside when Peanut retires/moves to a safety position. Jordan is in the conversation though. He can play DE, or be a LB in both a 3-4 and a 4-3 so he offers up a lot of flexibility. Jordan!? Are you kidding me?! A guy who some have described as "raw" because he lacks rushing technique and relies exclusively on athleticism?! A guy who is coming off a shoulder surgery?! A player who is almost universally considered as someone who needs to bulk up?! He'll go high because this is a weak year for pass rushers, because he's fast/explosive, and he shows the most potential, but there is no way he's a #1 overall guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Joeckel or Fisher or trading down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Jordan!? Are you kidding me?! A guy who some have described as "raw" because he lacks rushing technique and relies exclusively on athleticism?! A guy who is coming off a shoulder surgery?! A player who is almost universally considered as someone who needs to bulk up?! He'll go high because this is a weak year for pass rushers, because he's fast/explosive, and he shows the most potential, but there is no way he's a #1 overall guy. Yes, Dion Jordan, the guy who is picked # 2 in the last 4 mock drafts posted on NFL.com. The guy who is the most explosive defensive player in the draft. You're right, he shows the most potential and in a year where the starting lineup is set for the most part I draft the guy with the most potential. IMO he has the ability to be a game changer with his speed and size (6'6" 4.54 40). I'd probably rather have Milliner though. If this question was meant to be posted a month ago I'd agree with you and say Joeckel. I'm not sure of the intent of the question though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Yes, Dion Jordan, the guy who is picked # 2 in the last 4 mock drafts posted on NFL.com. The guy who is the most explosive defensive player in the draft. You're right, he shows the most potential and in a year where the starting lineup is set for the most part I draft the guy with the most potential. IMO he has the ability to be a game changer with his speed and size (6'6" 4.54 40). I'd probably rather have Milliner though. If this question was meant to be posted a month ago I'd agree with you and say Joeckel. I'm not sure of the intent of the question though. That's too much risk on potential for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scs787 Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 That's too much risk on potential for me. You can say that with just about every player in the draft...remember 40% right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackerDog Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 You can say that with just about every player in the draft...remember 40% right? If you're JA, only about 10% of his early round picks made it. If he was hitting 400 he'd still be here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason Posted April 5, 2013 Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 You can say that with just about every player in the draft...remember 40% right? He's more of a risk than most/many others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.